Menu
We've got the best instructors.
It's a fact.
Meet our instructors

Your future is bright when you have these brilliant instructors on your side.

Antoine

MATH 211, MATH 275

Instructor
since2005
Prep
sessions276
View Profile
Pavel

CHEM 209

Instructor
since2011
Prep
sessions100
View Profile
Luke

ENGG 201

Instructor
since2007
Prep
sessions245
View Profile
Load more instructors

Antoine

MATH 211, MATH 275
Instructor since 2005
276 prep sessions
34611 students helped
Experience
2010 -Differential Equations Prep Instructor
2005 -CEGEP Math Instructor (Tenured)
2005 -Calculus (all levels) Prep Instructor
2005 -Linear Algebra Prep Instructor
2005 -Probability Prep Instructor
2001-4University Math Instructor
Education
2002-9Partial PhD Completion (Mathematics)
2005Certificate in University Teaching
2002MSc (Mathematics)
2000BSc (Mathematics)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.81
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.63
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.60
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.75
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.65
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.72
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 75.9%
satisfied 23.7%
not satisfied 0.4%
Pavel

Pavel

CHEM 209
Instructor since 2011
100 prep sessions
4200 students helped
Experience
2011 -Chemistry and Engineering Chemistry Prep Instructor
2009 -Organic Chemistry Tutor
2005 -Chemistry Tutor
2013-15MCAT Chemistry Prep Instructor
2009-11Organic Chemistry TA
Education
2011MSc (Inorganic Chemistry)
2008BSc (Chemistry)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.68
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.54
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.37
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.74
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.70
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.58
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 67.5%
satisfied 31.2%
not satisfied 1.3%

Luke

ENGG 201
Instructor since 2007
245 prep sessions
27131 students helped
Experience
2007-Physics Prep Instructor
2007-MCAT Physics Prep Instructor
2007Oscillations and Waves Lecturer
2004-6Physics Lab Demonstrator
2005Communications for Physicists Lecturer
2002-4Physics Tutor
2002-3Online Physics Course Co-developer
2002-3Electronics Lab Demonstrator
Education
2005MSc (Physics)
2004MSc (Physics)
2002BSc (Physics)
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
Expertise(understanding of course material)
 
5.73
Organization(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.61
Explanation(explains concepts clearly and concisely)
 
5.43
Engagement(shows enthusiasm and interest in material)
 
5.71
Responsiveness(answers questions thoroughly)
 
5.51
Preparation(thoroughly prepared to teach)
 
5.65
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 72.6%
satisfied 26.6%
not satisfied 0.8%
2 SESSION(S) ADDED
Total:$0
REGISTER NOW

Saghar

Biol 241, Biol 311, Chem 351
Instructor since 2010
10 prep sessions
427 students helped
Experience
2013–presentPrep Instructor, Mechanics 
2013–presentPrep Instructor, Statics
2012–presentTutor, Statics, Mechanics, Mechanics of Materials
2012–13TA, Engineering Mechanics II
2012–13TA, Mechanics of Solids 
2011-13TA Mechanics of Materials 
2011TA, Engineering Economics
2010TA, Engineering Design & Communication 
Education
2012–presentPh.D. [Mechanical Engineering]
2012M.Sc. [Mechanical Engineering]
2009B.Sc. [Mechanical Engineering]
Student evaluations
( 1=Very Poor, 2=Poor, 3=Adequate, 4=Good, 5=Very Good, 6=Excellent )
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
3.79
Presentation(presents material in a coherent manner)
 
5.71
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
5.58
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
1.75
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
5.83
PREPARATION(understanding of course material)
 
5.75
Student satisfaction
very satisfied 31%
satisfied 68%
not satisfied 1%